Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Wondering What’s Happening with Telehealth Legislation in Ohio?

Client Alert

Introduction

In December 2021, Governor DeWine signed into law HB 122, which will expand telehealth services in Ohio. The law takes effect in March 2022 and is in response to more patients relying on telehealth over the past two years during the height of the COVID pandemic, and more providers becoming comfortable with delivering services virtually. Telehealth is now a normalized healthcare delivery system nationwide. Beyond the safety benefits inherent in telehealth services, telehealth has made healthcare more accessible and more affordable for more people.

HB 122 At a Glance

HB 122 broadly expands the list of providers who can bill for telehealth services and replaces outdated regulations that limited access to telehealth care. Before HB 122, only physicians, physician assistants and advanced practice registered nurses could provide services via telehealth. HB 122 expands telemedicine use to include psychologists, speech and hearing therapists, physical therapists, counselors and social workers, dietitians, optometrists, chiropractors and several other health care specialties.[1] The law also removes the requirement that a patient’s initial visit be in-person and instead allows initial and annual patient visits to be conducted virtually.  

HB 122 requires both public (i.e., Medicaid and Medicare) and private insurance to cover telehealth services. Additionally, the law prohibits health plans from imposing cost sharing for telehealth services that exceeds the cost sharing for equivalent in-person services. 

Finally, HB 122 applies to more regulated treatment modalities. The law will allow physicians authorized to prescribe medical marijuana to conduct the required in-person patient exams via telehealth. While most patients that are prescribed a schedule II controlled substances are required to still attend their initial visit in-person, HB 122 sets forth several exceptions that allow for an initial visit via telehealth, including if 1) the patient is in palliative or hospice care; 2) the patient receives medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder; 3) the patient is currently under treatment for a diagnosed mental health condition; or 4) the patient is treated in an emergency situation. 

To ensure compliance with the new state telehealth laws, please contact Kevin Cripe at kmcripe@bmdllc.com, 614.246.7506, or your existing BMD healthcare attorney.

[1] The full list of allowed providers is: Advanced practice registered nurses; Optometrists licensed to practice under a therapeutic pharmaceutical agents certificate; Pharmacists; Physician assistants; Physicians; Psychologists and school psychologists, including school psychologists licensed under State Board of Education rules; Chiropractors; Audiologists and speech-language pathologists; Occupational therapists and physical therapists; Occupational therapy assistants and physical therapist assistants; Professional clinical counselors, independent social workers, and independent marriage and family therapists; Independent chemical dependency counselors; Certified Ohio behavior analysts; Dietitians; Respiratory care professionals; and Genetic counselors.


Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.

Corporate Transparency Act Update 3/14/24

On March 1, 2024, a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama concluded that the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) exceeded Congressional powers and enjoined the Department of the Treasury from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs. National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.). On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Ohio State University Launches Its Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program

In response to Ohio’s nursing shortage, The Ohio State University College of Nursing is accepting applications for its new Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing program (aBSN). Created for students with a bachelor’s degree in non-nursing fields, the aBSN allows such students to obtain their nursing degree within 18 months. All aBSN students will participate in high-quality coursework and gain valuable clinical experience. Upon completion of the program, graduates will be eligible to take the State Board, National Council of Licensure Exam for Registered Nursing (NCLEX-RN).

Another Transparency Obligation: The FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

Many physician practices and healthcare businesses are facing a new set of federal transparency requirements that require action now. The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements (the “Rule”), which was promulgated pursuant to the 2021 bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act, is intended to help curb illegal finance and other impermissible activity in the United States.

“In for a Penny, in for a Pound” is No Longer the Case for Florida Lawyers

On April 1, 2024, newly adopted Rule 1.041 to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures goes into effect which creates a procedure for an attorney to appear in a limited manner in civil proceedings.  Currently, when a Florida attorney appears in a civil proceeding, he or she is reasonable for handling all aspects of the case for their client.  This new rule authorizes an attorney to file a notice limiting the attorney’s appearance to particular proceedings or specified matters prior to any appearance before the court.  For example, an attorney can now appear for the limited purpose of filing and arguing a motion to dismiss.  Once the motion to dismiss is heard by the court, the attorney may file a notice of termination of limited appearance and will have no further obligations in the case.