Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Understanding Ohio House Bill 660: A Game-Changer for Student-Athletes

Client Alert

Understanding Ohio House Bill 660: A Game-Changer for Student-Athletes
Ohio House Bill 660 aims to revolutionize Ohio’s approach to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) agreements for student-athletes, building on the framework established by Governor Mike DeWine’s Executive Order 2021-10D. This legislation has the potential to create new financial opportunities for student-athletes while simplifying the regulatory landscape for universities. If passed, this bill will have far-reaching implications for Ohio’s higher education institutions and their athletes. Here’s what you need to know.

Key Provisions of Ohio House Bill 660

1. Direct Compensation for Student-Athletes

  • Universities can directly pay student-athletes for the use of their NIL, bypassing the need for third-party intermediaries. This provision reduces bureaucratic hurdles and streamlines the process for athletes to receive compensation.

2. Professional Representation

  • Student-athletes can obtain professional representation, such as agents or attorneys, to negotiate NIL agreements. This ensures that athletes have the opportunity to utilize expertise to assist with securing lucrative and fair contracts.

3. Clarification of Employment Status

  • The bill explicitly states that receiving NIL compensation does not classify student-athletes as employees, preserving their amateur status while allowing financial opportunities.

4. Protection from Restrictions

  • The bill prohibits athletic authorities from penalizing schools or athletes for participating in NIL deals, ensuring financial freedom and reducing fear of reprisal.

5. Simplified NIL Framework

  • By codifying the Executive Order, the bill aims to reduce administrative burdens and create a more transparent system for institutions and athletes alike.

Financial Implications for Student-Athletes

1. Expanded Opportunities

  • With the ability to enter NIL agreements, student-athletes can earn money through endorsements, promotional appearances, and more. High-profile stident-athletes may secure deals worth millions, significantly boosting their financial prospects.

2. Tax Responsibilities

  • NIL payments will be considered taxable income, requiring athletes to manage their finances carefully. Consulting tax professionals to track earnings and make estimated payments will be crucial.

3. Enhanced Earnings Potential

  • The removal of restrictions opens doors for more substantial financial opportunities, empowering athletes to capitalize on their unique marketability while still in school.

Challenges and Considerations
While Ohio House Bill 660 presents exciting opportunities, it also introduces challenges:

  • Power Dynamics: Universities negotiating NIL deals directly could raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest or undue influence over athletes.
  • Resource Allocation: Institutions may face financial and administrative strain to comply with the new regulations.
  • Ethical Questions: Ongoing debates regarding the fairness of universities controlling NIL negotiations, especially for high-value deals, feel inevitable.
  • Recruitment Disparities: The bill could widen the gap between schools with differing financial capabilities, affecting recruitment strategies.

What This Means for You
If you’re a student-athlete, parent, coach, or school administrator, Ohio House Bill 660 could significantly impact how you approach NIL agreements. Navigating these changes effectively will require understanding the bill’s provisions and preparing for the financial and legal implications.

Let’s Navigate This Together
The complexities of NIL laws call for expert guidance. Whether you’re looking to maximize opportunities or ensure compliance, we are here to help. Contact Member Scott Norcross at sanorcross@bmdllc.com or Partner Paige Rabatin at pmrabatin@bmdllc.com to discuss how House Bill 660 could affect you or your organization and how we can work together to make the most of these new possibilities.


Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.

Corporate Transparency Act Ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), lifting an injunction previously imposed by the Fifth Circuit. However, a separate nationwide injunction remains in effect, meaning businesses are still not required to comply with the CTA’s reporting requirements. FinCEN continues to accept voluntary reporting while enforcement remains paused.

Lead Paint Contamination and Resources for Ohio Landlords

Children are exposed to lead-based paint, which was used in most homes until it was banned in the US in 1978 and “can severely damage the brain and central nervous system causing coma, convulsions and even death.” Property owners and landlords should educate themselves on regulations and resources to mitigate their own liability.