Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

The CARES Act Provider Relief Fund: What We Know So Far…

Client Alert

The CARES Act that was signed into law on March 27, 2020 provides for the Provider Relief Fund, which set aside $100 billion in relief funds for healthcare providers with expenses or lost revenue attributable to COVID-19. On April 9, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) released the first round of $30 billion of funding. All healthcare providers that received Medicare fee-for-service reimbursements in 2019 should have received a distribution. Payments will be made via electronic payment. Providers that do not receive electronic payment will receive paper checks over the next few weeks.

Providers have 30 days to accept the funds and agree to the Terms and Conditions associated with the payment through electronic attestation. We recommend that that our provider clients wait to sign the attestation and use the funds until additional guidance and commentary is released on the Terms and Conditions. There are many gray areas that require additional guidance and clarification. 

Terms and Conditions: 

  • The provider must certify that it has billed Medicare in 2019 and currently provides diagnoses, testing, or care for individuals with possible or actual cases of COVID-19; is not currently terminated from participation in Medicare; is not currently excluded from participation in Medicare; is not currently excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, or other Federal health care programs; and does not currently have Medicare billing privileges revoked. 
  • The provider must certify that the payment will only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19, and be used to reimburse the provider only for healthcare related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to COVID-19.  
  • The provider must certify that it will not use the payment to reimburse expenses or losses that have been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are obligated to reimburse. 
  • The provider must submit reports to HHS to ensure compliance with these requirements.  
  • If the provider must submit a report to HHS if the provider has also received more than $150,000 in total funds under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economics Security Act (P.L. 116-136), the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act (P.L. 116-123), the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (P.L. 116-127), or any other Act providing COVID-19-related funding. This would include loans such as the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). This report shall contain: the total amount of funds received from HHS under these programs; the amount of funds received that were expended or obligated for reach project or activity; a detailed list of all projects or activities for which large covered funds were expended or obligated, including: the name and description of the project or activity, and the estimated number of jobs created or retained by the project or activity, where applicable; and detailed information on any level of sub-contracts or subgrants awarded by the covered recipient or its subcontractors or subgrantees, to include the data elements required to comply with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 allowing aggregate reporting on awards below $50,000 or to individuals, as prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 
  • The provider must maintain appropriate records and cost documentation, including, documentation required by 45 CFR §75.302 (financial management) and 45 CFR §75.361-75.365 (record retention and access), and other information required by future program instructions to substantiate the reimbursement of costs. The reports may be submitted to HHS and subject to audit and inspection.  
  • Providers cannot “balance bill” patients for any COVID-related treatment. All providers must bill patients as if the provider is an in-network provider even if the provider is out-of-network. Under the FFCRA and the CARES Act, private insurance plans are required to waive patient co-sharing payment requirements. 

Like with the implementation of the FFCRA and DOL guidance as well as the CARES Act and guidance from the SBA, we anticipate that HHS will release additional guidance to assist providers in determining compliance with the attestation and clarify the Terms and Conditions. We recommend that providers take a wait-and-see approach to evaluate this guidance and determine whether to accept the funds subject to the Terms and Conditions. 

CMS Accelerated and Advance Payment Program 

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS expanded its Accelerated and Advance Payment Program. This program is separate from the payments through the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund. These expedited payments are typically offered to providers struggling with claim submission or claim processing due to hurricanes, tornadoes, or other natural disasters and act as short term loans that must be repaid. During the first week of April 2020, CMS distributed $34 billion to healthcare providers as part of the Accelerated/Advance Payment Program. Important facts: 

  • The payments are available to both Part A and Part B providers. Providers can apply for accelerated payment via their MAC. To locate your MAC, click here
  • Generally, providers can request up to 100% of the Medicare payment amount for a 3-month period. Certain Part A providers can request up to 6 months.
  • Providers should be approved and funded within 7 days of submission of a complete request.
  • The CARES Act extended the repayment timeframe for these accelerated payments. Certain Part A providers and all Part B suppliers will have 210 days from the date of disbursement to repay the balance. Inpatient acute care hospitals, children’s hospitals, certain cancer hospitals, and CAHs will have up to 1 year to repay the payments. 
  • Repayment obligations will begin 120 days after payments are made. The payments will be paid through recoupment efforts by the MAC against Medicare claims submitted by the provider. If the funds are repaid within the 210 day period, the funds act as an interest-free short term loan. However, after 210 days, the MAC will issue a demand letter and interest will start to accrue.
  • Interest is set at the statutory rate (as set by the Department of Treasury), which is currently at 10.25%. Interest is assessed every 30 days until the debt is fully paid. 

Providers may have already applied for and received accelerated payments through this program. In such an instance, providers will still be eligible to receive the payments under the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund. However, providers must be aware of the repayment obligations associated with the accelerated funds. Further, it is unclear whether the CARES Act Provider Relief Funds may be used to repay the accelerated payments.

For more information, contact Amanda L. Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com or 330-253-9185.


UPDATE: Governor Dewine Signs HB 606 Granting Short Window of Immunity from COVID-19 Personal Injury Lawsuits

The Ohio General Assembly, in Am. Sub. H.B. No. 606, is in the final stages of passing a law that will prohibit lawsuits seeking damages from COVID-19. This includes injury, death, or loss to person or property if the lawsuits are based, in whole or in part, on the exposure to, or the transmission or contraction of the coronavirus, unless the defendant in the lawsuit acted intentionally or recklessly. In circumstances where this immunity does not apply, H.B. 606 prohibits such claims being aggregated and brought as a class action.

Revised Department of Labor FFCRA Guidance, Effective September 16, 2020

In response to attacks on the legality of the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule regarding the Families First Coronavirus Act (“FFCRA” or the “Act”), which took effect in April 2020, the Department of Labor issued new guidance on Friday, September 11th to formally address ongoing questions and concerns related to the COVID-19 legislation.

FCC Adds $198 Million to Strengthen Telehealth for Rural Healthcare Providers

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has added an additional $198 million in funding to its Rural Health Care Program. These funds will be used to increase broadband services and telecommunications to bolster telehealth/telemedicine services for rural healthcare providers. Funding for rural healthcare providers was initially capped at $605 million in 2020, but the added funds will now allow the FCC to provide over $800 million to eligible providers.

Finding Opportunity in Adversity: Optimism for the Construction Industry

Looking for good news? If so, you are not alone. Aside from the collective mental, physical and emotional human toll imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, entire sectors of the economy have been ravaged, and old, familiar ways of doing business have been disrupted. Although deemed essential, the construction industry has not been immune to interruption and uncertainty during these unprecedented times. Amid new health and safety concerns, coupled with financial uncertainty, progress on projects has slowed, and the start dates for a number of new projects slated to begin in 2020 have been deferred. However, resilience has always been a trademark of contractors, subcontractors and other industry professionals. Reports indicate that while the construction industry lost more than one million jobs February through April, at least 600,000 of those jobs had been gained back by the end of June.

Yard Sign Do’s and Don’ts: How to Avoid Legal Challenges to Municipal Sign Codes this Election Season

As the nation heads into the tail end of the 2020 general election, municipalities will inevitably face challenges as they seek to regulate the seasonal proliferation of yard signs on residential property. While the matter may seem trifling, a seemingly benign yet content-based sign ordinance can result in significant legal exposure for municipalities that have not heeded recent Supreme Court decisions on content neutrality.