Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Starting an Advanced Practice Provider Practice

Client Alert

Advanced practice providers (APPs), which includes non-physician providers such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse anesthetists, commonly start their own healthcare practices. Practices may provide, for example, service offerings such as primary care, anesthesiology, mental health, and aesthetics (medical spas). However, there are a number of considerations and steps that must be taken for APPs to compliantly function independently.

First and foremost, the state where the APP will be operating their practice dictates whether an APP can even open a practice independently. Key considerations include the following:

  1. State Scope of Practice Laws: Can the provider practice independently in the state, or is another provider, such as a physician required to be on-site? Are the services within the APP’s scope of practice, as dictated by state law? For example, in Ohio, nurse practitioners are required to have a standard care arrangement with a collaborating physician and must practice in accordance with their education, clinical experience, and national certification. CRNAs, for example, may be required to practice under their RN license if they wish to provide aesthetic services.
  2. State Corporate Practice of Medicine: Can an APP operate a healthcare practice in the state, or is it limited to physicians? Other considerations here include who the APP can hire at their practice, as some states, for example, do not let providers hire providers with “higher” licenses (i.e., an APP cannot hire a physician).

Once it is determined that an APP is permitted to open an independent practice, the APP will need to file their business in accordance with applicable state filing laws, typically dictated by the applicable state’s Secretary of State. For example, the practice may need to file as a professional entity rather than a regular business corporation or limited liability company. The practice will also need an employee identification number (EIN) in order to hire employees. Additionally, with the enactment of the Corporate Transparency Act, businesses may be required to submit a Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Report to the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Further, APPs should determine how they want to be paid, whether it be cash-pay, through insurance, or both. What is best for the practice will largely depend on the kinds of services being offered. If the APP determines they do want to accept insurance, they will need to complete the appropriate credentialing and application process for different payors. If the practice is a covered entity under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), it will also need a National Provider Identifier (NPI).

Lastly, the practice will need to obtain a site-specific Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) registration and/or terminal distributor of dangerous drugs (TDDD) license if the APP plans to prescribe controlled substances and/or dangerous drugs (prescription medications), unless the practice meets an exception for such licensure.

If you have any questions about any of the above information,  or any other questions related to starting your own practice, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana M. Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  


Employer Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

As employers encourage or require employees to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, they should be aware of OSHA recording obligations and potential workers’ compensation liability. Though OSHA has yet to revise its COVID-19 guidance in response to the latest CDC recommendations, OSHA has revised its position regarding the recording of injury or illness resulting from the vaccine. Until now, OSHA required an employer to record an adverse reaction when the vaccine was required for employees and the injury or illness otherwise met the recording criteria (work-related, a new case, and meets one or more of the general recording criteria). OSHA has reversed course and announced that it will not require recording adverse reactions until at least May 2022, irrespective of whether the employer requires the vaccine as a condition of employment. In its revised COVID-19 FAQs, OSHA states:

The New Rule 1.510 - Radical Change for Summary Judgement Procedure in Florida

In civil litigation, where both sides participate actively, trial is usually required at the end of a long, expensive case to determine a winner and a loser. In federal and most state courts, however, there are a few procedural shortcuts by which parties can seek to prevail in advance of trial, saving time, money and annoyance. The most common of these is the “motion for summary judgment”: a request to the court by one side for judgment before trial, generally on the basis that the evidence available reflects that a win for that party is legally inevitable and thus required. Effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment procedure in Florida has radically changed.

Vacating, Modifying or Correcting an Arbitration Award Under R.C. 2711.13: Three-Month Limitation Maximum; Not Guaranteed Amount of Time

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. R.C. 2711.13 provides that “after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may file a motion in the court of common pleas for an order vacating, modifying, or correcting the award.” Any such motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award “must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest.” In BST Ohio Corporation et al. v. Wolgang, the Court held the three-month period set forth in R.C. 2711.13 is not a guaranteed time period in which to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award. 2021-Ohio-1785.

EEOC Provides Updated Guidance Regarding Employer COVID-19 Vaccine Policies

On May 28, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission updated its guidance regarding employer COVID-19 vaccination policies. The new guidance provides much-needed clarification of expectations for employers seeking to promote workplace safety and prevent the spread of COVID-19, including discussion of mandatory vaccination policies, voluntary vaccination incentives, and accommodation of employees based on disability or sincerely held religious beliefs. The full text of the update is found in Section K of the EEOC’s COVID Q&A document. You can also learn more about these and other developments from BMD's Bryan Meek and Monica Andress through the Employment Law After Hours YouTube channel, available here.

What Telemedical Barriers Practices Face and How They Can Manage Them

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to many businesses and industries having to rapidly adapt new practices in order to stay profitable, and the healthcare industry is no exception. Although telehealth tools and practices have existed and been used since the Vietnam War, the pandemic has caused many individual healthcare practices to heavily rely on telehealth as a large portion of their service mix in order to continue to provide care for patients. Because of this rapid adoption of telehealth practices in order to combat the restrictions of COVID-19, the telemedicine industry’s revenue has exploded in the last year. Experts predict that telehealth will continue to grow in use beyond the current pandemic, estimating the industry’s worth to be $25 billion by 2025. However, this rapid adoption of telehealth was prompted out of need and has not been without its own barriers that practices now face.