Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Starting an Advanced Practice Provider Practice

Client Alert

Advanced practice providers (APPs), which includes non-physician providers such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse anesthetists, commonly start their own healthcare practices. Practices may provide, for example, service offerings such as primary care, anesthesiology, mental health, and aesthetics (medical spas). However, there are a number of considerations and steps that must be taken for APPs to compliantly function independently.

First and foremost, the state where the APP will be operating their practice dictates whether an APP can even open a practice independently. Key considerations include the following:

  1. State Scope of Practice Laws: Can the provider practice independently in the state, or is another provider, such as a physician required to be on-site? Are the services within the APP’s scope of practice, as dictated by state law? For example, in Ohio, nurse practitioners are required to have a standard care arrangement with a collaborating physician and must practice in accordance with their education, clinical experience, and national certification. CRNAs, for example, may be required to practice under their RN license if they wish to provide aesthetic services.
  2. State Corporate Practice of Medicine: Can an APP operate a healthcare practice in the state, or is it limited to physicians? Other considerations here include who the APP can hire at their practice, as some states, for example, do not let providers hire providers with “higher” licenses (i.e., an APP cannot hire a physician).

Once it is determined that an APP is permitted to open an independent practice, the APP will need to file their business in accordance with applicable state filing laws, typically dictated by the applicable state’s Secretary of State. For example, the practice may need to file as a professional entity rather than a regular business corporation or limited liability company. The practice will also need an employee identification number (EIN) in order to hire employees. Additionally, with the enactment of the Corporate Transparency Act, businesses may be required to submit a Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Report to the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Further, APPs should determine how they want to be paid, whether it be cash-pay, through insurance, or both. What is best for the practice will largely depend on the kinds of services being offered. If the APP determines they do want to accept insurance, they will need to complete the appropriate credentialing and application process for different payors. If the practice is a covered entity under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), it will also need a National Provider Identifier (NPI).

Lastly, the practice will need to obtain a site-specific Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) registration and/or terminal distributor of dangerous drugs (TDDD) license if the APP plans to prescribe controlled substances and/or dangerous drugs (prescription medications), unless the practice meets an exception for such licensure.

If you have any questions about any of the above information,  or any other questions related to starting your own practice, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana M. Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  


Ohio Department of Health Releases Updated Charge Limits for Medical Records

Under Ohio law, a healthcare provider or medical records company that receives a request for a copy of a patient's medical record may charge an amount in accordance with the limits set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 3701.741. The allowable amounts are increased or decreased annually by the average percentage of increase or decrease in the consumer price index for all urban consumers, prepared by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the immediately preceding calendar year over the calendar year immediately preceding that year, as reported by the Bureau. The Director of the Ohio Department of Health makes this determination and adjusts the amounts accordingly. The list is then published, here.

No Surprises Act Compliance (Published by NAMAS, 2/25/22)

The Department of Health and Human Services published three parts to the No Surprises Act towards the end of 2021, which took effect January 1, 2022. The Act is intended to protect consumers from “balance billing,” which occurs when a patient receives a bill with a higher price than they may have anticipated because they did not have knowledge that the provider or facility was out-of-network. The purpose of this article is to note certain requirements that compliance employees will need to be aware of at their facilities, including notice and consent, good faith estimates, and public disclosures.

No Surprises Act and You (Published in the SCMS Winter 2022 Newsletter)

Legislation has been adopted by the United States Congress and the Ohio Legislature known as the “No Surprises Act” which attempts to regulate billing by professionals and facilities to patients who are not in networks with those facilities or providers at those facilities. The federal bill was triggered by some sensational news stories of patients being billed for tens of thousands of dollars for emergency care when the hospital was out of the network under the patient’s insurance plans.

Are You Impacted by the Project Labor Agreement Executive Order?

Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) are a quasi-collective bargaining agreement between employers and unions. They establish the terms and conditions of employment, including dispute resolution. They are put into place on specific projects and apply to the contractor, whether it is union or non-union. Employees hired on the project will be treated as union.

No Surprises Act Update: Federal Judge Strikes Portions of the No Surprises Act

In a win for providers, a Texas federal court granted the Texas Medical Association’s (TMA) motion for summary judgment and struck down portions of a federal rule that establishes a reimbursement rate arbitration process between payors and providers under the No Surprises Act (NSA).