Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Starting an Advanced Practice Provider Practice

Client Alert

Advanced practice providers (APPs), which includes non-physician providers such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse anesthetists, commonly start their own healthcare practices. Practices may provide, for example, service offerings such as primary care, anesthesiology, mental health, and aesthetics (medical spas). However, there are a number of considerations and steps that must be taken for APPs to compliantly function independently.

First and foremost, the state where the APP will be operating their practice dictates whether an APP can even open a practice independently. Key considerations include the following:

  1. State Scope of Practice Laws: Can the provider practice independently in the state, or is another provider, such as a physician required to be on-site? Are the services within the APP’s scope of practice, as dictated by state law? For example, in Ohio, nurse practitioners are required to have a standard care arrangement with a collaborating physician and must practice in accordance with their education, clinical experience, and national certification. CRNAs, for example, may be required to practice under their RN license if they wish to provide aesthetic services.
  2. State Corporate Practice of Medicine: Can an APP operate a healthcare practice in the state, or is it limited to physicians? Other considerations here include who the APP can hire at their practice, as some states, for example, do not let providers hire providers with “higher” licenses (i.e., an APP cannot hire a physician).

Once it is determined that an APP is permitted to open an independent practice, the APP will need to file their business in accordance with applicable state filing laws, typically dictated by the applicable state’s Secretary of State. For example, the practice may need to file as a professional entity rather than a regular business corporation or limited liability company. The practice will also need an employee identification number (EIN) in order to hire employees. Additionally, with the enactment of the Corporate Transparency Act, businesses may be required to submit a Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) Report to the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

Further, APPs should determine how they want to be paid, whether it be cash-pay, through insurance, or both. What is best for the practice will largely depend on the kinds of services being offered. If the APP determines they do want to accept insurance, they will need to complete the appropriate credentialing and application process for different payors. If the practice is a covered entity under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), it will also need a National Provider Identifier (NPI).

Lastly, the practice will need to obtain a site-specific Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) registration and/or terminal distributor of dangerous drugs (TDDD) license if the APP plans to prescribe controlled substances and/or dangerous drugs (prescription medications), unless the practice meets an exception for such licensure.

If you have any questions about any of the above information,  or any other questions related to starting your own practice, please don’t hesitate to contact BMD Health Law Group Member Jeana M. Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001, or BMD Attorney Rachel Stermer at rcstermer@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2019.  


HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.