Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

Client Alert

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) recently granted a petition filed by the state of South Carolina to determine whether Medicaid recipients have the right to choose their provider without state interference. Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act generally requires state Medicaid programs to permit Medicaid beneficiaries to seek care from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or provider that is qualified and willing to deliver care to beneficiaries.

South Carolina filed its petition in response to a Fourth Circuit ruling that prevented South Carolina’s Medicaid program from terminating its provider agreement with Planned Parenthood. In the Fourth Circuit case, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic argued that Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act gives Medicaid beneficiaries the right to seek care from any qualified and willing provider and that it was not Congress’ intent for states to intrude on a Medicaid patients’ personal decisions about medical care. Arguments will take place this spring; SCOTUS will consider the merits of the case and issue a decision by the end of the summer.

If you have questions about the Supreme Court’s decision to determine whether a Medicaid beneficiary has an enforceable right to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is unqualified, please contact Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com, Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com, or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


Ohio Department of Medicaid Proposes Changes to Dental Reimbursement and Coverage Rule

The Ohio Department of Medicaid is proposing amendments to Ohio Administrative Code. There will be a hearing on the proposed rule changes August 12, 2024.

Will Division II and III Athletic Programs Survive the New Era of College Athletics?

The potential reclassification of student-athletes as employees presents major financial challenges for Division II and III sports programs, which may struggle to afford the costs and could be forced to cut or eliminate non-revenue-generating sports. Recent legal rulings, including the Alston case and Johnson v. NCAA, have challenged the NCAA's amateurism model and prompted a need for innovative solutions to sustain these programs.

Corporate Transparency Act: Business Owners Must Act Now

The Corporate Transparency Act requires all reporting companies to file their Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report by year-end to avoid penalties. Companies formed before January 1, 2024, have less than six months to comply. Learn more in a client alert by BMD Member Blake Gerney.

New Medicare Billing Rules: What MFTs, MHCs, and IOP Providers Need to Know

Starting January 1, 2024, Medicare began covering services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) services. With this change, Medicare has become the primary payer for these services.

Chevron Doctrine No More: What the Supreme Court’s Ruling Means for Agency Authority

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court invalidated the Chevron doctrine, nearly 40 years after it first took effect.