Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

Client Alert
April 8, 2025

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content. While AI offers innovative solutions in business, entertainment, and communication, it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

A “deepfake” can be created by malicious actors who manipulate existing, legitimate images, videos, and audio recordings to create new fraudulent content. This fraudulent content is then used to deceive, defraud, and/or impersonate legitimate content from real individuals and brands. For example, our firm recently represented a business professional whose original video content was scraped from the internet, edited using AI, and re-uploaded to a platform where they did not have an account. The altered videos were then used to promote a fraudulent product falsely attributed to our client, leading to reputational harm and consumer confusion.

Currently, the capabilities of AI can be used to create fraudulent content such as:

1. “Deepfake” Videos that Misrepresent Endorsements or Beliefs

AI-generated “deepfake” videos can convincingly manipulate existing, legitimate video footage to make it appear as though a person in the existing footage is saying or doing something they never did in the original video. These fakes are now being used in:

  • fake endorsements where a person appears to promote a product or service they’re not associated with
  • manipulated interviews or speeches that falsely portray an individual as holding controversial or offensive opinions
  • fraudulent ads where an individual is inserted into a fraudulent video to lend credibility to a product/scam

The result is not only reputational harm to the original party but also the potential for legal liability if consumers act on these “deepfakes”.

2. AI “Voice Clones” Used in Fraud And Impersonation

AI voice synthesis tools can now clone a person’s speech patterns, tone, and inflection with remarkable and convincing accuracy. These voice clones are now being used to:

  • place scam calls in which the voice of a trusted colleague, family member, or executive is replicated
  • create fake voicemails or recordings such as fake customer service lines, political robocalls, or misleading audio snippets shared on social media
  • bypass security checks, especially those using voice authentication systems

Because voice is such a personal and persuasive medium, these scams can be particularly effective and often difficult to detect.

3. Repackaged or Stolen Content Misused on Digital Platforms

In many cases, bad actors scrape legitimate, existing content such as videos, podcasts, social media posts, or livestreams from the internet and re-upload them—often out of context—making it seem as though the speaker supports a particular viewpoint or product. The content can also be re-uploaded with an AI narration or branding, suggesting affiliation with companies or causes the original party does not endorse. This not only infringes intellectual property rights but also misleads audiences and can divert income from the rightful content creator.

How to detect AI “Deepfakes”

Despite rapid improvements in AI, many fraudulent AI video, audio, and other content may display subtle flaws such as:

  • Awkward or unnatural facial movements
  • lip-syncing issues (the words spoken do not match the way the person’s mouth is moving)
  • Flat, unnatural, or robotic speech patterns
  • Lighting or background inconsistencies
  • A lack of verification on official social media or websites from the person supposedly involved in the content

When in doubt, search for the original source and consult reputable news outlets and official pages.

What to do Next

If you discover that your image, voice, or content has been used without authorization, you may have both legal and practical remedies. First, report the content to the hosting platform. If your original content has been copied or altered, copyright law may provide grounds for removal. In addition, make sure to preserve the evidence—take screenshots, save links, and document any public confusion, customer complaints, or reputational fallout. Depending on your situation, you may have claims under defamation law, the right of publicity, consumer protection statutes, and/or tort law.

For more information, please contact Susan A. Jacobsen at 216.298.1452 x848 or sajacobsen@bmdllc.com.

AIdeepfakes
Client Alert

Ohio's Recent Rule Changes to Administration of Immunizations, Outpatient Pharmacy Delivery, and Mobile Response Services

January 20, 2025The Ohio Board of Pharmacy (“BOP”) and Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OMHAS”) recently posted notices of Ohio Administrative Code rule changes related to the administration of immunizations (BOP), outpatient pharmacy delivery services (BOP), and mobile response and stabilization services (OMHAS).Client Alert

HOA Construction Project Do’s and Don’ts

January 20, 2025Local regulators can approve new construction, but if a resident contacts their homeowners association there may be trouble. Fences, yard alterations, and backyard decks do not have to be such a hassle and a point of conflict. Find out general Do’s and Don’ts to help HOA residents avoid issues in this article by BMD Partner Scott Heasley.Client Alert

New Ohio Recovery Housing Rules Take Effect January 1, 2025

January 2, 2025Ohio’s new recovery housing rules, effective January 1, 2025, require certified community behavioral health providers to refer clients only to accredited recovery housing residences listed on the statewide registry.Client Alert

SCOTUS to Weigh In on Medicaid Beneficiaries’ Right to Choose their Provider

January 2, 2025The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments this spring on whether Medicaid beneficiaries have an enforceable right to choose their healthcare providers without state interference, as outlined in Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act. This case stems from a South Carolina petition challenging a Fourth Circuit ruling that blocked the state from terminating Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid provider agreement.Client Alert

I Went to Bed and the Rules Changed: the Corporate Transparency Act is Back on Hold

December 27, 2024The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ordered on December 26, 2024 that in an effort to “preserve the constitutional status quo” while it considered the Federal Government’s appeal, it vacated the prior order for a stay of the nationwide injunction pending appeal entered on December 23, 2024, and reinstated the preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and its corresponding Reporting Rule.
Older posts
Newer posts