Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

Client Alert
April 8, 2025

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content. While AI offers innovative solutions in business, entertainment, and communication, it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

A “deepfake” can be created by malicious actors who manipulate existing, legitimate images, videos, and audio recordings to create new fraudulent content. This fraudulent content is then used to deceive, defraud, and/or impersonate legitimate content from real individuals and brands. For example, our firm recently represented a business professional whose original video content was scraped from the internet, edited using AI, and re-uploaded to a platform where they did not have an account. The altered videos were then used to promote a fraudulent product falsely attributed to our client, leading to reputational harm and consumer confusion.

Currently, the capabilities of AI can be used to create fraudulent content such as:

1. “Deepfake” Videos that Misrepresent Endorsements or Beliefs

AI-generated “deepfake” videos can convincingly manipulate existing, legitimate video footage to make it appear as though a person in the existing footage is saying or doing something they never did in the original video. These fakes are now being used in:

  • fake endorsements where a person appears to promote a product or service they’re not associated with
  • manipulated interviews or speeches that falsely portray an individual as holding controversial or offensive opinions
  • fraudulent ads where an individual is inserted into a fraudulent video to lend credibility to a product/scam

The result is not only reputational harm to the original party but also the potential for legal liability if consumers act on these “deepfakes”.

2. AI “Voice Clones” Used in Fraud And Impersonation

AI voice synthesis tools can now clone a person’s speech patterns, tone, and inflection with remarkable and convincing accuracy. These voice clones are now being used to:

  • place scam calls in which the voice of a trusted colleague, family member, or executive is replicated
  • create fake voicemails or recordings such as fake customer service lines, political robocalls, or misleading audio snippets shared on social media
  • bypass security checks, especially those using voice authentication systems

Because voice is such a personal and persuasive medium, these scams can be particularly effective and often difficult to detect.

3. Repackaged or Stolen Content Misused on Digital Platforms

In many cases, bad actors scrape legitimate, existing content such as videos, podcasts, social media posts, or livestreams from the internet and re-upload them—often out of context—making it seem as though the speaker supports a particular viewpoint or product. The content can also be re-uploaded with an AI narration or branding, suggesting affiliation with companies or causes the original party does not endorse. This not only infringes intellectual property rights but also misleads audiences and can divert income from the rightful content creator.

How to detect AI “Deepfakes”

Despite rapid improvements in AI, many fraudulent AI video, audio, and other content may display subtle flaws such as:

  • Awkward or unnatural facial movements
  • lip-syncing issues (the words spoken do not match the way the person’s mouth is moving)
  • Flat, unnatural, or robotic speech patterns
  • Lighting or background inconsistencies
  • A lack of verification on official social media or websites from the person supposedly involved in the content

When in doubt, search for the original source and consult reputable news outlets and official pages.

What to do Next

If you discover that your image, voice, or content has been used without authorization, you may have both legal and practical remedies. First, report the content to the hosting platform. If your original content has been copied or altered, copyright law may provide grounds for removal. In addition, make sure to preserve the evidence—take screenshots, save links, and document any public confusion, customer complaints, or reputational fallout. Depending on your situation, you may have claims under defamation law, the right of publicity, consumer protection statutes, and/or tort law.

For more information, please contact Susan A. Jacobsen at 216.298.1452 x848 or sajacobsen@bmdllc.com.

AIdeepfakes
Client Alert

Tariffs, Market Downturn, and Employment Considerations for Employers

April 7, 2025As tariffs continue to impact various industries, employers must prepare for the ripple effects these economic pressures can have on workforce management. The economic impact can dramatically impact companies’ bottom lines, and companies look to improve finances and save for the future and many will choose to reduce employee count/wages.Client Alert

Corporate Transparency Act Overhauled: U.S. Entities No Longer Required to Report

March 24, 2025The Department of Treasury has issued an interim final rule significantly altering the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As of March 21, 2025, all U.S.-created entities and their beneficial owners are exempt from reporting requirements. Only non-U.S. entities registered to do business in the U.S. must still report, but they are not required to disclose U.S. citizen owners. Business owners should stay informed on these changes and consult legal counsel for compliance guidance.Client Alert

ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

March 21, 2025The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.Client Alert

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

March 19, 2025On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.Client Alert

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

March 5, 2025The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.
Older posts