Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Parental Approval Mandate for Diagnosing Gender-Related Conditions in Minors under Ohio House Bill 68

Client Alert

Effective August 6, 2024, mental health professionals cannot diagnose or treat a minor presenting with a gender-related condition without first obtaining consent from one of the minor's parents, a legal custodian, or a guardian. The law, established by Ohio House Bill 68 (HB 68) and recently upheld by a Franklin County Common Pleas Court judge, imposes stringent requirements on the process that must be followed in these cases.

This mandate applies to a wide range of professionals, including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) specializing in psychiatric-mental health, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed social workers, counselors, and marriage and family therapists.

HB 68 defines a “gender-related condition” broadly to include any situation where an individual feels an incongruence between their gender identity and biological sex, with gender dysphoria being the most commonly recognized condition. Before addressing any gender-related condition, mental health professionals are required by law to first screen the minor for other comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, ADHD, and autism spectrum disorder. Additionally, professionals must assess the minor for signs of physical, sexual, mental, or emotional abuse, as well as other traumas that might be influencing the gender-related condition.

In other words, providers must account for the order of operations required by HB 68 (diagnosing gender conditions last) and parents/guardians need to fully consent to that plan of action. If providers do not take both steps, then they are considered to be engaging in “unprofessional conduct” that could subject them to discipline by their professional licensing board.

If you have any questions regarding HB 68 or would like assistance ensuring your policies and procedures comply with the new law or any of its provisions, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


Medical Marijuana Rules and You

The Ohio Medical Board has adopted regulations in conjunction with the Ohio Pharmacy Board that would govern physicians who may elect to participate under the Ohio Medical Marijuana statutes.

BMD Obtains Dismissal of ADA Title III Suit Against National Outlet Mall Chain

On January 12, 2018, Brennan, Manna & Diamond obtained the dismissal of an Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) lawsuit filed against Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The suit, which was brought under Title III of the ADA, alleged that Tanger’s Byron Center, Michigan outlet mall contained barriers to access in violation of the ADA’s accessibility requirements. The plaintiff demanded prospective injunctive relief, including a retrofit of the entire mall, as well as expert witness and attorneys’ fees.

CLIENT ALERT: Bureau of Workers' Compensation Budget Amends Law

Bureau of Workers' Compensation Budget Amends Law As we head into 2018, you should be aware of some recent changes made in Ohio’s laws concerning Workers’ Compensation. These changes became effective September 29, 2017. Some will affect business more than others, but these are changes you should really know about.

Client Alert: NLRB Reverses 2015 Browning-Ferris Joint Employer Decision

The NLRB issued a 3-2 decision reversing the Board’s standard for joint employment in collective bargaining that it issued in the 2015 Browning-Ferris decision. That controversial decision by the liberal leaning Board overturned years of precedent and significantly expanded the definition of joint employment. The decision spurred legislation (H.R. 3441, the Save Local Business Act) to overturn the expansive definition, and replace it with a far more narrow and proper definition of joint employment.

Ohio Court of Appeals Upholds Sanctions for Attorney’s Frivolous Conduct

On August 28, 2017, the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eleventh District upheld a trial court’s order imposing frivolous conduct sanctions in the amount of $22,926.72 on a plaintiff’s attorney and his law firm in the case of Keith-Harper v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc., --- N.E.3d ----, 2017-Ohio-7361 (11th Dist. Lake).