Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Parental Approval Mandate for Diagnosing Gender-Related Conditions in Minors under Ohio House Bill 68

Client Alert

Effective August 6, 2024, mental health professionals cannot diagnose or treat a minor presenting with a gender-related condition without first obtaining consent from one of the minor's parents, a legal custodian, or a guardian. The law, established by Ohio House Bill 68 (HB 68) and recently upheld by a Franklin County Common Pleas Court judge, imposes stringent requirements on the process that must be followed in these cases.

This mandate applies to a wide range of professionals, including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) specializing in psychiatric-mental health, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed social workers, counselors, and marriage and family therapists.

HB 68 defines a “gender-related condition” broadly to include any situation where an individual feels an incongruence between their gender identity and biological sex, with gender dysphoria being the most commonly recognized condition. Before addressing any gender-related condition, mental health professionals are required by law to first screen the minor for other comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, ADHD, and autism spectrum disorder. Additionally, professionals must assess the minor for signs of physical, sexual, mental, or emotional abuse, as well as other traumas that might be influencing the gender-related condition.

In other words, providers must account for the order of operations required by HB 68 (diagnosing gender conditions last) and parents/guardians need to fully consent to that plan of action. If providers do not take both steps, then they are considered to be engaging in “unprofessional conduct” that could subject them to discipline by their professional licensing board.

If you have any questions regarding HB 68 or would like assistance ensuring your policies and procedures comply with the new law or any of its provisions, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.


CLIENT ALERT: Medicare Providers having multiple locations should verify and revalidate their address information to avoid claim denials

MLN Matters SE19007 “Activation of Systematic Validation Edits for OPPS Providers with Multiple Service Locations” notifies providers that Medicare is now requiring the exact match of all addresses for practice locations that are listed on provider claim submissions to Medicare.

CLIENT ALERT: Capitalizing on New Opportunity Zone Incentives to Spur Economic Development

CLIENT ALERT: New Opportunity Zone Incentives Promise to Spur Economic Development

CLIENT ALERT: HB 159 - Regulatory Indemnity Provisions in Public Works Design Contracts

Representative Louis W. Blessing III (R-Colerain Township) recently introduced HB 159 to regulate the use of indemnity provisions in professional design contracts related to public improvements. The purpose of the proposed legislation is to prohibit public agencies from requiring design professionals to indemnify them from claims which are not attributable to negligent or other wrongful conduct on the part of the design professional.

CLIENT ALERT: Construction Law Update: Communication is Key! And Other Lessons Learned From A Recent Public Project Court Decision

In a recent decision, the Ohio Court of Claims entered a $2.2 million judgment in favor of the general trades contractor, and against a public university, in connection with an on-campus renovation project. Mid American Construction, LLC v. Univ. of Akron, Ct. of Cl. No. 2016-00685JD, 2018-Ohio-4513.

CLIENT ALERT: Ohio Incentivizes Cybersecurity Measures

On November 2, 2018, Ohio’s Data Protection Act (“DPA”) went into effect. The DPA incentivizes Ohio businesses to proactively address cybersecurity and data protection by providing an affirmative defense/safe harbor for claims related to data breach. However, the safe harbor is only applicable if the organization can prove “reasonable compliance” to the DPA.