Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio's 2024-2025 Fiscal Budget - Behavioral Health Updates

Client Alert

Ohio’s 2024-2025 State Budget was signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine on July 3, 2023. Behavioral health is an area that Governor DeWine expressed great interest in supporting and the final version of the Budget does reflect some of those initiatives. The Budget prioritizes growing the behavioral health workforce and increasing research and innovation by building community capacity for care that offers better crisis response services and treatment, increased prevention efforts, and increased provision of residential and outpatient services. Outlined below are notable Budget items geared toward achieving growth and improvement in the behavioral health field as well as some key items that were rejected by Governor DeWine’s veto.

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline

988 Lifeline Centers receive 10,000+ calls, chats, and texts each month from Ohioans. Consequently, the Budget has allocated $86.5M across the biennium to crisis centers to ensure Ohioans in need have access to appropriate behavioral health resources close to home and reduce the burden on local law enforcement and emergency departments.

Building the Workforce

In attempting to grow a strong and supportive behavioral health workforce, the Budget provides for increased rates for community behavioral health providers, continued support for Centers of Excellence and Tech Assistance Centers, and investments in pediatric inpatient and residential settings for youth and children. To enhance pediatric behavioral health, $50M in one-time funds have been allocated to enhance the workforce and residential treatment environments.

Building Resiliency through Prevention and Early Identification

Focusing on student mental health, $13.9M across the biennium was allocated for suicide prevention, expansion of the student assistance program, and student wellness and success initiatives including the payment of behavioral wellness coordinators.

Increasing Inpatient Access

$14M across the biennium has been allocated to the growth of state hospital capacity by adding 30 beds and staff support to state psychiatric hospitals in central Ohio. Additionally, these funds will leverage bed availability at private psychiatric hospitals for vulnerable Ohioans without coverage.

Increasing Housing Options and Quality

In distributing a $64.5M allocation across the biennium, the Residential State Supplement (RSS) Program Budget has increased from $16M per year to $24M per year. Further, in providing continued support for community transition programs to help those with mental illness or addiction to successfully re-enter upon prison release, this allocation aids in growing the quality of Recovery Housing across Ohio.

Expanding Jail and Forensic Services

$63.5M across the biennium has been allocated in support of the expansion of jail and forensic services. Specifically, this allocation will aid in enhancing forensic centers’ capacity for court-ordered psychological evaluations and monitoring and support of specialty courts. Additionally, the funds will be used to improve the ability for jails in Ohio to provide addiction services. Lastly, funds will authorize jail-based competency restoration.

Kickstarting Innovation and Research for Wellness and Recovery

$30M across the biennium has been allocated to establish the State of Ohio Action for Resiliency Network (“SOAR”) that will research, establish best practices, and provide funding to implement better mental health and addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery strategies. OhioMHAS will create working groups that incorporate providers, patients, community stakeholders and others to implement this program.  

Relevant Budget Vetoes

House Bill 33 proposed several behavioral health initiatives that did not survive Governor DeWine’s veto. First, HB 33 sought to implement statute-based payment rates for Medicaid components administered by the Department of Developmental Disabilities including personal care services, adult day services, and ICF/IID services. The item was vetoed with DeWine with the reasoning that establishing rates within a statute, rather than a rule, would restrict the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Department of Development Disabilities, and the Ohio Department of Aging’s ability to manage the policies and costs of the Medicaid program while being compliant with federal law.

Second, HB 33 sought to require the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services and the Ohio Department of Medicaid to develop and implement standards and procedures for the exchange of Medicaid recipient information. Specifically, the proposal would have allowed a board of alcohol, drug addiction, and mental health services to advocate on behalf of Medicaid recipients who have been identified as needing addiction or mental health services. However, DeWine vetoed reasoning that a statute requiring the Department of Medicaid to share sensitive Medicaid information would be unnecessarily risky and in violation of federal privacy laws.

Lastly, a proposal in HB 33 would have exempted federally qualified health centers that provide behavioral healthcare services from certification from the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. The item was vetoed with DeWine reasoning that the public wellbeing is best protected when all healthcare services are properly certified by the appropriate state agency.

Should you have any questions on these recent behavioral health updates or how to get involved in these initiatives, please contact Partner Ashley Watson at abwatson@bmdllc.com.


Corporate Transparency Act Overhauled: U.S. Entities No Longer Required to Report

The Department of Treasury has issued an interim final rule significantly altering the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As of March 21, 2025, all U.S.-created entities and their beneficial owners are exempt from reporting requirements. Only non-U.S. entities registered to do business in the U.S. must still report, but they are not required to disclose U.S. citizen owners. Business owners should stay informed on these changes and consult legal counsel for compliance guidance.

ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.

HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.