Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Passes Antidiscrimination Provision for CRNA Reimbursement

Client Alert

The passage of Ohio House Bill 96 (HB 96), which sets forth the state’s operating budget, includes important legislation regarding certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). Health benefit plans will soon be required to pay CRNAs at the same reimbursement rate as their physician counterparts for performing the same service. The new law seeks to promote patient access to care by prohibiting discrimination against CRNAs acting within the scope of their licensure. In recent years, CRNAs have faced payment discrimination from certain insurers who reduced their reimbursement rate from 100% to 85%, or who prohibited CRNA reimbursement altogether, based on their status as non-physician practitioners. Meanwhile, physician anesthesiologists are reimbursed at 100% for providing the same care.

Advocates for provider nondiscrimination have argued that discrimination based on provider licensure keeps patients from accessing the care they need. Ohio’s new law is an attempt to remedy this barrier to patient care while ensuring CRNAs are paid equally for performing the same tasks as physician anesthesiologists.

Ohio joins several other states who have enacted similar legislation for payment equality among providers rendering the same service including Maine[1], Virginia[2], Delaware[3], and New Hampshire[4]. This legislation does not prevent insurers from establishing variable reimbursement rates based on quality or performance measures. The new law will go into effect on September 30, 2025.

If you have any questions about the impact of HB 96 on CRNA reimbursement, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

[1] 24-A MRSA §4320-Q

[2] VA Code Ann. § 38.2-3408

[3] 19 DE Admin. Code 1341-4.11

[4] N.H. Rev. Stat. § 420-J:8(VIII)(f)


RNs and APRNs Take Note: Ohio Board of Nursing Mandates a New CE Reporting Period

Ohio’s Board of Nursing has updated the continuing education reporting period for RNs and APRNs. Beginning March 26, 2026, CE credits must be completed between July 1 and June 30 of odd-numbered years, replacing the previous November to October timeframe.

Ohio Med Spas: Peptide Do's and Do Not's

Recent guidance from the Ohio Board of Pharmacy outlines key compliance requirements for med spas using peptides. While some peptide drugs are FDA approved, others are not or cannot be compounded. Med spa operators should ensure they source medications from licensed suppliers, avoid non-approved or “research use only” products, and follow all compounding and storage regulations to maintain compliance and avoid enforcement actions.

Substance Use Disorder Providers: 42 CFR Part 2 Now Enforceable

Updates to 42 CFR Part 2 are now enforceable, bringing significant changes to how substance use disorder (SUD) records are handled. The Final Rule aligns Part 2 more closely with HIPAA, introduces updated penalties, allows a single patient consent for treatment, payment, and operations, and adds new requirements for Notices of Privacy Practices. It also creates a formal definition of SUD counseling notes and imposes strict consent requirements for their use and disclosure. Providers should review and update policies to ensure compliance.

AAA Introduces AI-Assisted Arbitrator for Certain Disputes

The American Arbitration Association has introduced an AI-assisted arbitration platform designed to streamline certain document-based disputes. While a human arbitrator still makes the final decision, the technology can improve efficiency, reduce costs, and accelerate case resolution. Companies should weigh these benefits against considerations such as transparency, risk, and contractual requirements before adopting AI-assisted arbitration.

Quiet Hours Texts and TCPA Claims: Consent Remains King as Courts Divide on Text Messages

Businesses face increasing TCPA lawsuits over off-hours marketing texts, but recent court decisions highlight strong defenses. Clear consumer consent and updated terms and conditions can defeat many claims, while a growing number of courts are finding that text messages are not “telephone calls” under the statute. Proactive compliance measures, including clickwrap agreements and forum-selection clauses, are critical to reducing risk.