Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Chiropractors Can Now Provide Evaluation and Management Services to Medicaid Patients

Client Alert

Medicaid Will Cover Low-and Moderate Level Evaluation and Management Services Performed by Ohio Chiropractors
The Department of Medicaid released a statement that Medicaid will cover low-and moderate level E&M services represented by CPT codes 99202, 99203, 99212, and 99213 when performed by a chiropractor. The Department of Medicaid will cover up to three E&M services per benefit year and plans to make these changes effective by October 1, 2022.[1]  

Ohio H.B. 136 expanded Medicaid coverage of chiropractic services to include evaluation and management (E&M) services provided by a licensed chiropractor.[2] Further, there is no requirement for the chiropractor to obtain prior authorization or receiving a referral from another prescriber. Moreover, Medicaid must pay the chiropractor the same rate it pays any other licensed health professional for the same service.

It should be noted that federal law limits coverage for chiropractic services to treatment by means of spinal manipulation.[3] The Ohio law exempts chiropractic services from the limitations set out in the statute and requires that Medicaid cover the services without federal financial participation. 

The primary sponsor of H.B. 136 was State Rep. Scott Lipps.[4] Rep. Lipps spoke about H.B. 136 stating that it “will improve access to chiropractic treatment options for Medicaid patients.”[5] Rep. Lipps included that “This expansion is vital as chiropractic treatment is a non-addictive and cost-effective option for many patients who might otherwise turn to opioids. This bill simply offers an alternative solution to pain management thereby moving Ohio closer to alleviating the opioid crisis.”[6] The Ohio State Chiropractic Association and the Northeast Ohio Academy of Chiropractic both supported H.B. 136.[7] Remarkably, there was no testimony submitted opposing H.B. 136.[8]

Prior to H.B. 136, Ohio’s Medicaid Program only covered certain chiropractic services.[9] In alignment with the Federal Medicaid limitations on chiropractic coverage, the Department of Medicaid adopted rules that limited “chiropractic services to manual manipulation of the spine for correction of a subluxation after a determination has been made via physical examination or diagnostic imaging that the subluxation exists.”[10] Payments are allowed for the diagnostic imaging required to determine the existence of a subluxation.[11] However, “Unless prior authorization is received, coverage is limited to the following: one treatment per day, two images of the entire spine per year, two sessions of any other images per six-month period, 30 visits in an outpatient setting per year for individuals younger than 21, and 15 visits in an outpatient setting for individuals older than 21.”[12]

Now, H.B. 136 has substantially expanded the services a chiropractor can provide under Medicaid to E&M services.[13] Importantly, H.B. 136 allows the Director of Medicaid to adopt additional rules; thus, there is a potential for expansion in the future. [14] The Ohio Department of Medicaid estimated that there would be 1.33 E&M visits per chiropractic patients, which would result in around $11.1 million worth of E&M services from chiropractors.[15] Additionally, now that chiropractors can see patients for E&M services, additional cost shifting may occur if patients choose to visit a chiropractor instead of a different healthcare practitioner.[16] Overall, H.B. 136 allows chiropractors to bill for E&M services under the Medicaid Program, in efforts to fight the opioid epidemic and provide different avenues of pain management. 

For more information, please contact Amanda Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com or 330-253-9185.


[1] These changes will be made in the O.A.C. 5160-8-11.

[2] H.B. 136, 134 Gen. Assembly., Reg. Sess. (Oh. 2022).  H.B. 136 amended O.R.C. § 5162.06 and enacted O.R.C. §§ 5164.061, 5167.15.

[3] Jason Hoskins, Final Analysis, H.B. 136 134th General Assembly (June 28, 2022, 9:25 AM), https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/download?key=18641&format=pdf.

[4] Bill Expanding Access to Chiropractic Care Passes General Assembly, Heads to Governor, The Ohio House of Representatives (June 28, 2022, 8:39 AM), https://ohiohouse.gov/members/p-scott-lipps/news/bill-expanding-access-to-chiropractic-care-passes-general-assembly-heads-to-governor-109065#:~:text=State%20Rep.,chiropractic%20care%20for%20Medicaid%20patients.

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] Id.; see also Jordan Laird, Could Expanded Access to Chiropractor Services Curb Opioid Prescriptions?, Springfield News-Sun (June, 28 2022, 8:52 AM), https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/local/could-expanded-access-to-chiropractor-services-curb-opioid-prescriptions/MUBCFQPYTFEKBJFRWHGN7W2GTU/ (“‘Conservative treatment like chiropractic offers two major benefits: It saves lives by reducing opioid use and abuse and it saves money by offsetting more expensive and invasive treatments,’ Spaulding said.”).

[8] Laird, supra; see also House Bill 136 -134th General Assembly, The Ohio House of Representatives (June 28, 2022, 8:59 AM), https://ohiohouse.gov/legislation/134/hb136/votes (passing with only three votes against it passage in the house and zero in the senate).

[9] Hoskins, supra; see also O.A.C. 5160-8-11(listing what is currently covered).

[10] Nelson V. Lindgren, Final Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement, H.B. 136 134th General Assembly

[11] Id.

[12] Hoskins, supra.

[13] Id. (“The bill requires the Medicaid Program to cover [E&M] services provided by a licensed chiropractor.”).

[14] Id.

[15] Id.

[16] Id.


The Masks Are Back: New OSHA Regulations for Healthcare Employers

Employment Law After Hours is back with a News Break Episode. Yesterday, OSHA published new rules for healthcare facilities, including hospitals, home health employers, nursing homes, ambulance companies, and assisted living facilities. These new rules are very cumbersome, requiring mask wearing for all employees, even those that are vaccinated. The only exception is for fully vaccinated employees (2 weeks post final dose) who are in a "well-defined" area where there is no reasonable expectation that any person with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 will be present.

New OSHA Guidance for Workplaces Not Covered by the Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard

On June 10, 2021, OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for occupational exposure to COVID-19, but it applies only to healthcare and healthcare support service workers. For a detailed summary of the ETS applicable to the healthcare industry, please visit https://youtu.be/vPyXmKwOzsk. All employers not subject to the ETS should review OSHA’s contemporaneously released, updated Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19 in the Workplace. The new Guidance essentially leaves intact OSHA’s earlier guidance, but only for unvaccinated and otherwise at-risk workers (“at-risk” meaning vaccinated or unvaccinated workers with immunocompromising conditions). For fully vaccinated workers, OSHA defers to CDC Guidance for Fully Vaccinated People, which advises that most fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing masks or physically distancing, except where required by federal, state, or local laws or individual business policies.

Employer Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

As employers encourage or require employees to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, they should be aware of OSHA recording obligations and potential workers’ compensation liability. Though OSHA has yet to revise its COVID-19 guidance in response to the latest CDC recommendations, OSHA has revised its position regarding the recording of injury or illness resulting from the vaccine. Until now, OSHA required an employer to record an adverse reaction when the vaccine was required for employees and the injury or illness otherwise met the recording criteria (work-related, a new case, and meets one or more of the general recording criteria). OSHA has reversed course and announced that it will not require recording adverse reactions until at least May 2022, irrespective of whether the employer requires the vaccine as a condition of employment. In its revised COVID-19 FAQs, OSHA states:

The New Rule 1.510 - Radical Change for Summary Judgement Procedure in Florida

In civil litigation, where both sides participate actively, trial is usually required at the end of a long, expensive case to determine a winner and a loser. In federal and most state courts, however, there are a few procedural shortcuts by which parties can seek to prevail in advance of trial, saving time, money and annoyance. The most common of these is the “motion for summary judgment”: a request to the court by one side for judgment before trial, generally on the basis that the evidence available reflects that a win for that party is legally inevitable and thus required. Effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment procedure in Florida has radically changed.

Vacating, Modifying or Correcting an Arbitration Award Under R.C. 2711.13: Three-Month Limitation Maximum; Not Guaranteed Amount of Time

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. R.C. 2711.13 provides that “after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may file a motion in the court of common pleas for an order vacating, modifying, or correcting the award.” Any such motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award “must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest.” In BST Ohio Corporation et al. v. Wolgang, the Court held the three-month period set forth in R.C. 2711.13 is not a guaranteed time period in which to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award. 2021-Ohio-1785.