Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio Board of Pharmacy COVID-19 Waiver Update

Client Alert

The State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy has issued waivers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to aid licensed practitioners in their day-to-day operations. As the pandemic has continued over the years, the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy has intermittently reviewed the various waivers. Effective August 10, 2022, some of those waivers that were once granted have been rescinded. Below is a brief description of the rescinded waivers and the impact of their rescission. The Board of Pharmacy website sets forth a full list of the current waivers and rescinded waivers.

Brief Title/Description of Waiver

Impact of Rescission

Extension of emergency refills for schedule III-V controlled substances permitting longer supply for each prescription and to permit more frequent refills.

Adjusted O.R.C. § 4729.281 to permit pharmacists to dispense certain refills up to 3 times without a prescription. Requires health insurance to cover these medications if the drugs were already covered by the plan.

 

Three things must be met before the pharmacist may refill the medication:

  1. The pharmacy has a record of the prescription and the prescription does not provide information for refills or a time that refills must be provided.
  2. The pharmacist is unable to obtain authorization from appropriate health care professionals.
  3. The pharmacist, using judgment, determines this drug is necessary to sustain the life of the patient, continue therapy, or will cause patient harm if not dispensed to the patient.

Authorized prescribers in an opioid treatment center are permitted to delegate personal furnishings of buprenorphine products to licensed nurses.

This waiver has now been adopted in OAC 4729:5-21-02(F)(3), so the permission to delegate personal furnishing of buprenorphine to licensed nurses is now supported by law.

Storage and use of dangerous drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 was permitted at a facility’s satellite location if the facility was a terminal distributor of dangerous drugs and complied with various standards.

This waiver was rescinded without any part of it becoming law. Satellite locations of facilities are no longer permitted to maintain possession, custody, or control of dangerous drugs.

Waiver of the 5 percent limit on wholesale sales of dangerous drugs by a licensed pharmacy, as defined in OAC 4729:5-3-09.

The waiver was rescinded. The 5 percent limit on occasional wholesale sales, as defined in OAC 4729:5-3-09, is now required again.

Suspend in-person BLS training. Pharmacists were able to meet their Basic Life Support training requirements and obtain online certifications through various organizations without having to attend in-person training.

A pharmacist must complete a BLS training curse that is offered either wholly in-person or at least partially in-person. OAC 4729:1-3-02(M) and OAC 4729:2-3-02(A)(3).

Expand the pharmacy intern supervision requirements in OAC 4729:2-1-01 for interns administering COVID-19 vaccine from a maximum number of 6 interns to a new, maximum number of 12 interns if a licensed nurse of EMS personnel is assisting. If there are two licenses nurses or two or more EMS personnel, then there can be up to 18 interns.

This expansion is rescinded and there can now be only a maximum of 6 interns being supervised by the pharmacist while administering immunizations.

National Guard personnel assigned to any Ohio-licensed pharmacy may perform technician trainee activities (4729:3-3-01) and any other COVID-19 waivers issues by the board under direct supervision of a pharmacist without registration by the board.

This authorization to permit National Guard personnel to serve as pharmacy technicians is rescinded and National Guard personnel may not operate as a pharmacy tech without registration by the board.

 

For information regarding Ohio Board of Pharmacy regulations, please contact Kate Hickner at kehickner@bmdllc.com or any member of our Healthcare & Hospital Law Practice Group


Enhancing Privacy Protections for Substance Use Disorder Patient Records

On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) finalized updated rules to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) for the protection of Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) patient records. The updated rules reflect the requirement that the Part 2 rules be more closely aligned with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) privacy, breach notification, and enforcement rules as mandated by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020.

Columbus, Ohio Ordinance Prohibits Employers from Inquiries into an Applicant’s Salary History

Effective March 1, 2024, Columbus employers are prohibited from inquiring into an applicant’s salary history. Specifically, the ordinance provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to:

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board’s Latest Batch of Rules: What Providers Should Know

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board has introduced new rules and amendments, covering various aspects such as CDCA certificate requirements, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, remote supervision, and reciprocity application requirements. Notable changes include revised criteria for obtaining a CDCA certification, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, and updated ethical obligations for licensees and certificate holders, including non-discrimination, confidentiality, and anti-sexual harassment measures.

Governor Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University Introduce the SOAR Study on Ohio Mental Illness

On January 19, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University announced a new research initiative, the State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (“SOAR”) study, which will investigate all factors influencing Ohio’s mental illness and addiction epidemic.

CHANGING TIDES: Summary and Effects of Burnett et. al. v. National Ass’n of Realtors, et. al.

In April 2019, a class-action Complaint was filed in federal court for the Western District Court for Missouri arguing that the traditional payment agreements employed by many across the United States amounted to conspiracy resulting in the artificial increase in brokerage commissions. Plaintiffs, a class-action group comprised of sellers, argued that they paid excessive brokerage commissions upon the sale of their home as a result of the customary payment structure where Sellers agree to pay the full commission on the sale of their property, with Seller’s agent notating the portion of commission they are willing to pay to a Buyer’s agent at closing on the MLS or other similar system.