Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

New Vaccine Requirement for Select CMS-Participating Facilities

Client Alert

On November 4, 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (“CMS”) released a new rule requiring certain healthcare facilities to implement policies requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. It does not matter if a staff member does not perform patient treatment services, they must still be vaccinated if an employee of an applicable facility.

Particularly, staff at these facilities should be given at least the first dose of an accepted vaccine within 30 days of November 5, 2021. Phase 2 will require staff to have their second dose within 60 days of November 5, 2021. Acceptable vaccines include, and at this time are limited to, Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson.

Applicable Facilities

The new requirement does not apply to all facilities that provide healthcare services, but rather only those facilities that are regulated by CMS as one of the following:

  • Ambulatory surgical centers;
  • Hospices;
  • Programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly;
  • Hospitals;
  • Long-term care facilities;
  • Psychiatric residential treatment facilities;
  • Intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities;
  • Home health agencies;
  • Comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facilities;
  • Critical access hospitals;
  • Clinics (rehabilitation agencies, and public health agencies as providers of outpatient physical therapy and speech language pathology services);
  • Community mental health centers;
  • Home infusion therapy suppliers;
  • Rural health clinics/federally qualified health centers; and
  • End-stage renal disease facilities.

While a facility may render some of the services listed above, that does not necessarily mean that a facility is required to comply with the rule. For example, if a facility provides care for psychiatric patients, the rule still may not apply if the facility is not regulated by CMS as a psychiatric residential treatment facility.

Additionally, while many facilities identify as “clinics,” the rule states that there are only approximately 5,000 clinics who are Medicare and Medicaid-certified rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers. Therefore, without this qualification, the rule will not apply.

However, facilities who are not required to comply with this new rule should note that their facility may still need to follow the OSHA COVID-19 Employer Emergency Temporary Standard, which requires employers with more than 100 employees to be vaccinated, or undergo regular testing, among other requirements. For more information, read this client alert by BMD Healthcare Litigation Member Stephen Matasich. 

Staff Exemptions

Staff who work full-time remotely do not need to be vaccinated under the new rule.

However, staff members are still able to seek either bona-fide religious or medical exemptions to exclude them from the vaccine requirement. For those that are given an exemption, the facilities must ensure that reasonable accommodations are given to the employee, while still minimizing the risk of the spread of COVID-19. CMS refers to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) website for further guidance on this topic.

Compliance/Discipline

Those facilities who do not comply with the new rule within the specified timeframe will be subject to civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, and, in extreme circumstances, exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid. CMS plans to oversee facilities through state surveyors, and has noted that interpretive guidelines outlining how surveyors will determine compliance will be published in the future. However, CMS has already stated that reviewing records of staff vaccinations, staff interviews, and review of facility vaccine policies and procedures are among some of the procedures that will be used to detect noncompliance.

Questions

If you have any further questions about the new rule or are unsure of whether it is applicable to your facility, please contact Labor + Employment Partner Bryan Meek at bmeek@bmdllc.com (330.253.5586) or Healthcare and Hospital Law Member Amanda Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com (330.253.9185).

Bryan and Amanda will be hosting an informative webinar on Wednesday, November 17 at 2 PM ET to discuss who the new rule applies to, and if so, what steps should be taken to comply. Click here for more information and registration.


Ohio Department of Medicaid Proposes Changes to Dental Reimbursement and Coverage Rule

The Ohio Department of Medicaid is proposing amendments to Ohio Administrative Code. There will be a hearing on the proposed rule changes August 12, 2024.

Will Division II and III Athletic Programs Survive the New Era of College Athletics?

The potential reclassification of student-athletes as employees presents major financial challenges for Division II and III sports programs, which may struggle to afford the costs and could be forced to cut or eliminate non-revenue-generating sports. Recent legal rulings, including the Alston case and Johnson v. NCAA, have challenged the NCAA's amateurism model and prompted a need for innovative solutions to sustain these programs.

Corporate Transparency Act: Business Owners Must Act Now

The Corporate Transparency Act requires all reporting companies to file their Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report by year-end to avoid penalties. Companies formed before January 1, 2024, have less than six months to comply. Learn more in a client alert by BMD Member Blake Gerney.

New Medicare Billing Rules: What MFTs, MHCs, and IOP Providers Need to Know

Starting January 1, 2024, Medicare began covering services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) services. With this change, Medicare has become the primary payer for these services.

Chevron Doctrine No More: What the Supreme Court’s Ruling Means for Agency Authority

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court invalidated the Chevron doctrine, nearly 40 years after it first took effect.