Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Litigation Holds: First Aid for the Thorn in a Corporation’s Side

Blog Post

Corporations can retain needless, unstructured data that lack business value. These “redundant, obsolete, and trivial” data, or “ROT,” carry unnecessary cost. Retaining ROT also inhibits many facets of a corporation’s operations, including e-discovery, privacy, and cybersecurity, among others, especially in the event of a litigation hold.

What is a litigation hold?

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e), when an organization becomes involved in a dispute, it must issue a litigation hold to relevant and appropriate custodians to preserve information that may be needed or required to be disclosed during the discovery process of litigation.

What are the implications?

Under Fed. R. 37(e), sanctions are authorized for parties that do not preserve electronically stored information (“ESI”) with their custodians, resulting in lost or destroyed ESI. Sanctions can be avoided for recoverable or altered ESI. While sanctions can vary widely, they are serious in nature and create exposure for the corporation. Sanctions can range from fines to even dismissal or default judgment

What can a corporation do to address and avoid these issues?

Two solutions exist that can act as first aid to ease the nagging pain and discomfort of litigation holds. First, a corporation can utilize data remediation, which acts as a “healing ointment” to recognize, cleanse, organize, and migrate data. This permits an organization to eliminate or minimize risk through a consistent practice.

However, when a litigation hold occurs, this data remediation process must stop, due to the duty to preserve ESI. Data can be stored in many locations, including on cloud storage, servers, local computers, and even various types of mobile devices. In addition to location of the data, the issue can further compound when litigation holds are issued in various legal matters. Data remediation becomes complex. This could create significant financial exposure. 

The second solution addresses these above-mentioned concerns: through effective legal representation, custodian litigation holds can be adjusted throughout the life of a case, which can allow a data remediation process for a corporation to function even within a litigation hold. Strategic legal counsel can interview and assess custodians to develop a strategy both at the outset of a case and as the case proceeds.

Consultation and reliance upon knowledgeable, strategic-minded legal counsel to effectively manage litigation holds can make a multi-million-dollar, positive impact for an organization, even in a single case. BMD has effectively implemented these tactics and navigated litigation holds, resulting in significant cost-savings for its clients while still maintaining compliance with litigation holds and e-discovery protocols in a defensible plan.

If you have any questions regarding litigation holds or how your corporation can prepare for the event of a litigation hold, please contact Angelina Gingo at acgingo@bmdllc.com or Bob Hager at rahager@bmdllc.com.


Invitation to Banks & Family Office/Ultra-high Net Worth Investors Exploring Cannabis Lending to Join Our Informal Institutional Cannabis Lenders Community

An update on the latest developments in the cannabis banking/lending space by subject matter expert, BMD Scottsdale/Phoenix Office Managing Partner Stephen Lenn

Community Banks: Collaboration, not isolation, is the key to protecting/ enhancing the cannabis business you pioneered

As we prepare for the plenary session of the informal institutional cannabis lenders community announced in my previous article, I am pleased to advise that participants now include 5 of the best-known dedicated loan funds; a select group of commercial banks ranging in size from single state community banks to mid-size regionals making cannabis loans into the mid-8 figures; and, a syndicator of credit union cannabis loans.

Non-compete Agreements are Under Fire: What Employers Need to Know

Non-compete agreements are an ongoing topic of dispute. Employers and their advocates point to the efficacy of non-competes in protecting proprietary information. Employees and their advocates argue about worker mobility and that employers unduly burden workers’ ability to seek better jobs. The Biden administration has put forth its position, and state legislatures have introduced bills addressing the enforceability of non-competes. Here is what you need to know:

BMD’s Jason Butterworth Quietly Engineers Some of Akron’s Most Impactful Projects

Jason Butterworth, a team member of BMD’s Business & Corporate practice, focuses his practice on finance, real estate, and tax credit law.

Explosive Growth in Pot of Gold Opportunity for Bank (and Other) Cannabis Lenders Driving Erosion of the Barriers

Our original article on bank lending to the cannabis industry anticipated that the convergence of interest between banks and the cannabis industry would draw more and larger banks to the industry. Banks were awash in liquidity with limited deployment options, while bankable cannabis businesses had rapidly growing needs for more and lower cost credit. Since then, the pot of gold opportunity for banks to lend into the cannabis industry has grown exponentially due to a combination of market constraints on equity causing a dramatic shift to debt and the ever-increasing capital needs of one of the country’s fastest growing industries. At the same time, hurdles to entry of new banks are being systematically cleared as the yellow brick road to the cannabis industry’s access to the financial markets is being paved, brick by brick, by the progressively increasing number and size of banks that are now entering the market.