Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

FTC Increases Targeting of Companies Lacking Cyber Protection

Client Alert
May 13, 2024

Here is how businesses can develop cyber strategies to mitigate breaches and financial risk.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently released a comprehensive cybersecurity report outlining key findings and recommendations based on emerging threats, trends in data breaches, and strategies for businesses to enhance their cybersecurity posture observed over the last year. The FTC strives to protect consumer privacy and respond to the evolving ways that companies use consumer data such as in the development of artificial intelligence models and misuse of health data. 

Importantly, the report emphasized the need for proactive measures to mitigate risks and highlighted the FTC’s initiative in targeting companies that fail to implement reasonable data security measures to protect consumer data. 

Here are some key strategies for businesses: 

  1. Risk Assessment and Management: Conduct regular risk assessments (at least annually) to identify potential vulnerabilities and prioritize them based on their potential impact on the business. Develop and implement a risk management plan to address these vulnerabilities effectively.
  2. Cyber Security Policies and Procedures:  Implement basic cybersecurity policies to protect its assets, data, and operations from cyber threats.
  3. Employee Training and Awareness: Educate employees about cybersecurity best practices, such as recognizing phishing emails, using strong passwords, and reporting suspicious activity. Regular training exercises help reinforce awareness.
  4. Access Control and Privilege Management: Implement strong access controls to limit user privileges and restrict access to sensitive data and systems. Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) where possible to add an extra layer of security.
  5. Data Encryption: Encrypt sensitive data to protect it from unauthorized access. 
  6. Patching: Keep software and systems up to date with the latest security patches to address known vulnerabilities. Establish a patch management process to ensure timely deployment of patches across the organization.
  7. Network Security: Deploy firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and other network security measures to monitor and protect against unauthorized access and malicious activity. Segment networks to limit the spread of potential breaches.
  8. Incident Response Plan: Develop a comprehensive incident response plan that outlines procedures for detecting, containing, and mitigating cybersecurity incidents. Test the plan regularly through tabletop exercises and simulations.
  9. Vendor Risk Management: Assess the security practices of third-party vendors and service providers to ensure they meet your organization's security standards. Include contractual clauses that outline security requirements and responsibilities.
  10. 10. Cyber Insurance: Consider obtaining cyber insurance to mitigate financial risks associated with cybersecurity incidents, such as data breaches or business interruptions.

By adopting a proactive approach to cybersecurity and implementing these strategies, businesses can enhance their cybersecurity posture and better protect themselves against evolving threats and complying with ever increasing legal obligations.  

BMD assists companies design and implement a strategy to achieve technical and organizational controls to bolster cybersecurity and data protection.  

If you have any questions regarding this topic and how to protect your company's data, please contact BMD Member Brandon Pauley at btpauley@bmdllc.com.

Cybersecurityfederal trade commissionBrandon PauleyConsumer PrivacyArtificial Intelligence
Client Alert

Board of Pharmacy Rule Changes

April 1, 2024Board of Pharmacy made changes to rules effective on March 4, 2024Client Alert

Counselor, Social Workers, and Marriage and Family Therapist (CSWMFT) Board Rule Changes

March 29, 2024The Counselor, Social Workers, and Marriage and Family Therapist (CSWMFT) Board has proposed changes to the Ohio Administrative Code rules discussed below. The rules are scheduled for a public hearing on April 23, 2024, and public comments are due by this date. Please reach out to BMD Member Daphne Kackloudis for help preparing comments on these rules or for additional information.Client Alert

Latest Batch of Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board Rules: What Providers Should Know

March 25, 2024The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board recently released several new rules and proposed amendments to existing rules over the past few months. A hearing for the new rules was held on February 16, 2024, but the Board has not yet finalized them.Client Alert

Now in Effect: DOL Final Rule on Classification of Independent Contractors

March 21, 2024Effective March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has adopted a new standard for the classification of employees versus independent contractors — a much anticipated update since the DOL issued its Final Rule on January 9, 2024, as previously discussed by BMD.  In brief, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) creates significant protections for workers related to minimum wage, overtime pay, and record-keeping requirements. That said, such protection only exists for employees. This can incentivize entities to classify workers as independent contractors; however, misclassification is risky and can be costly.Client Alert

Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

March 15, 2024Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.
Older posts
Newer posts