Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Employee or Independent Contractor? New Guidance Issued by the Department of Labor

Client Alert

On January 9, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its long-awaited final rule — effective March 11, 2024 — revising its prior interpretation of worker classifications under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The new final rule rescinds the standard previously established in 2021, in turn, shifting the analysis of whether a worker is an employee (versus an independent contractor) of a business from a more streamlined “economic reality” test to a more complex “totality of the circumstances” standard.

Understanding and correctly applying this new analysis is critical given the implications of worker misclassification under the FLSA — employees are entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, and other benefits, whereas independent contractors are not entitled to such benefits but enjoy greater flexibility and independence.

Under the new standard, the following non-exhaustive list of factors will be taken into consideration:

  1. The opportunity for profit or loss a worker might have based on their skillset (i.e., factors that impact a worker’s economic success or failure);
  2. The financial state and nature of any resources (e.g., capital or entrepreneurial) a worker has invested in the work;
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship (i.e., whether the work relationship is indefinite versus temporary in nature);
  4. The degree of control an employer has over the person’s work (e.g., who sets the worker’s schedule, who oversees and/or directs performance, and whether the worker can maintain other jobs);
  5. Whether the work the person does is essential (i.e., critical, necessary, or central) to the employer’s business; and
  6. The worker’s skill and initiative, including whether the worker contributes to business-like initiatives.

While the above analysis is, again, limited to worker classifications under the FLSA, it is very likely to have a significant impact going forward as, per the DOL, the final rule is intended to stretch broadly across all industries to “reduce the risk that employees are misclassified as independent contractors while providing a consistent approach for businesses that engage with individuals who are in business for themselves.”

The new final rule, while not controlling law, will inevitably serve as persuasive guidance in federal misclassification cases.

For additional information on the new DOL guidance or how it may impact your company, please reach out to Monica Andress at (330) 253-9153 or mbandress@bmdllc.com, or any member of the Labor and Employment Team of Brennan, Manna & Diamond LLC.


Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.