Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Direct Support Professional Retention Payments

Client Alert

On December 15, the Ohio Senate and House passed House Bill 45, which authorizes the Department of Developmental Disabilities (DODD), in conjunction with the county boards of developmental disabilities, to launch their initiative to issue retention payments to Direct Support Professionals (DSPs). These retention payments will be distributed quarterly to participating home and community-based waiver providers to address the workforce crisis in the direct provider sector. Governor DeWine needs to sign the Bill to begin the payments, but he is expected to do so by the end of 2022.

Who is eligible?

Agency and independent providers in good standing that have received claim payments for the eligible services during the applicable calendar quarter will be eligible for an automatic retention payment. Eligible services include:

  • Homemaker/Personal Care (HP),
  • HPC-Daily Billing Unit,
  • HPC-Participant-Directed,
  • On-Site/On-Call,
  • Shared Living,
  • Transportation (Medical & Non-Medical),
  • Adult Day Support,
  • Career Planning,
  • Group Employment Support,
  • Vocational Habilitation, and
  • Individual Employment Support.

Independent providers will receive the retention payments automatically and do not need to take any further actions to receive them. Agency providers, conversely, must opt-in via the eMBS application on the DODD website, provide all required data for each quarter, and attest that funds were used in accordance with DODD requirements in order to receive retention funds. Agency providers must ensure that expenditures made using the DODD funds are not claimed in any other program.

When will the payments be made?

The initiative was originally approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with an effective date of July 1. Therefore, initial payments will be for three quarters of payments (April through December) and will be staggered by provider type. Provider agencies and independent providers will receive their first payments in mid-January. Provider agencies will then distribute payments to their eligible DSP employees. DSPs employed by agency providers will receive payment from their employers in mid-March.

There is no definitive end date for payments at this time but DODD and the county agencies will continue to evaluate the program.

How much will retention payments be?

The retention payments for independent and agency providers will be calculated by multiplying 6.5% by the total amount of claims paid during the applicable calendar quarter for eligible services.

Agency providers will then need to calculate how much to pay each eligible employee based on the funds received. Employees may be allocated payments based on either (1) an equal percentage of their total wages or (2) an equal payment based on the payment divided by the number of employees. Agency providers may withhold up to 18% of the total payment for implementation and other costs, with additional reporting requirements. Agency providers may not use this payment as a way to increase hourly wages.

Generally, independent contractors of agencies will not be eligible for retention payments. However, DODD specifically identifies shared living contractors, where the agency bills for the contractor’s services, as an exception. Shared living contracted staff should be included in the employee payment calculation.

Where can I find the enrollment portal, or more information?

DODD has created a website specifically for these payments, which can be found at: https://dodd.ohio.gov/providers/RetentionPayment. This is also where the enrollment portal will be located from January 3-16.

If you have any questions about the DSP payments or how your agency might apply for them, please contact Ashley Watson at abwatson@bmdllc.com or your local BMD Healthcare Attorney.


Enhancing Privacy Protections for Substance Use Disorder Patient Records

On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) finalized updated rules to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) for the protection of Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) patient records. The updated rules reflect the requirement that the Part 2 rules be more closely aligned with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) privacy, breach notification, and enforcement rules as mandated by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020.

Columbus, Ohio Ordinance Prohibits Employers from Inquiries into an Applicant’s Salary History

Effective March 1, 2024, Columbus employers are prohibited from inquiring into an applicant’s salary history. Specifically, the ordinance provides that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice to:

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board’s Latest Batch of Rules: What Providers Should Know

The Ohio Chemical Dependency Professionals Board has introduced new rules and amendments, covering various aspects such as CDCA certificate requirements, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, remote supervision, and reciprocity application requirements. Notable changes include revised criteria for obtaining a CDCA certification, expanded services for LCDCs and CDCAs, and updated ethical obligations for licensees and certificate holders, including non-discrimination, confidentiality, and anti-sexual harassment measures.

Governor Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University Introduce the SOAR Study on Ohio Mental Illness

On January 19, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and The Ohio State University announced a new research initiative, the State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (“SOAR”) study, which will investigate all factors influencing Ohio’s mental illness and addiction epidemic.

CHANGING TIDES: Summary and Effects of Burnett et. al. v. National Ass’n of Realtors, et. al.

In April 2019, a class-action Complaint was filed in federal court for the Western District Court for Missouri arguing that the traditional payment agreements employed by many across the United States amounted to conspiracy resulting in the artificial increase in brokerage commissions. Plaintiffs, a class-action group comprised of sellers, argued that they paid excessive brokerage commissions upon the sale of their home as a result of the customary payment structure where Sellers agree to pay the full commission on the sale of their property, with Seller’s agent notating the portion of commission they are willing to pay to a Buyer’s agent at closing on the MLS or other similar system.