Brennan, Manna & Diamond
Listen. Solve. Empower.
About
Our Core Values
Community Involvement
Diversity & Inclusion
Team
Practice
Contact
Resources
Events
News
Payment
Careers
Resources
Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia
Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.
Client Alert
Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies Medical Statute of Limitations
February 1, 2021
The Ohio Supreme Court issued a decision in late December that clarifies and finalizes the Ohio law regarding the period of time in which patients can assert claims for medical malpractice. The Court was examining the interplay between three different statutes being the statute of limitations, the statute of repose, and the savings statute.
Posted by
Scott P. Sandrock
Client Alert
BMD Obtains Supreme Court Victory on Behalf of Sterilite of Ohio, LLC
August 28, 2020
Columbus, Ohio – On August 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its opinion in Lunsford v. Sterilite of Ohio, LLC, Slip Op. No. 2020-Ohio-4193. The Supreme Court’s 4-3 decision reversed an Ohio Court of Appeals ruling that had reinstated a putative class action against Sterilite brought by a group of current and former employees claiming that Sterilite’s use of “direct observation” urinalysis screening violated their common law right to privacy.
Posted by
BMD Employment Litigation Practice Group
Client Alert
CLIENT ALERT: Ohio Supreme Court Rules that a Subcontractor's Construction Defects are Not a Covered "Occurrence" Under a CGL Policy
October 10, 2018
Although a growing number of states have held that CGL policies provide coverage for damages caused by the defective work of subcontractors, the Ohio Supreme Court has refused to join the national trend. In Ohio N. Univ. v. Charles Constr. Servs., Inc., 2018-Ohio-4057, the Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled that a subcontractor’s faulty workmanship is not a covered “occurrence” under a typical CGL policy.
Posted by
Martin J. Pangrace, Partner, BMD Construction Group
News Article
Ohio Supreme Court Liquidated Damages Analysis: Hindsight is not 2020!
February 25, 2016
In a case decided on February 24, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court construed the enforceability of a liquidated damages provision in a public works construction contract. The Court held that when evaluating the enforceability of a liquidated damages provision in a construction contract, the court must conduct its analysis prospectively, based on the per diem amount of the liquidated damages at the time the contract is executed, and not retrospectively, based on the total amount of liquidated damages that ultimately accrue.
Posted by
Robert A. Hager